Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMwambi, Henry G.
dc.creatorHassan, Ali Satty Ali.
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-11T08:12:57Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T08:12:57Z
dc.date.created2012
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10413/9119
dc.descriptionThesis (M.Sc.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2012.en
dc.description.abstractMuch data-based research are characterized by the unavoidable problem of incompleteness as a result of missing or erroneous values. This thesis discusses some of the various strategies and basic issues in statistical data analysis to address the missing data problem, and deals with both the problem of missing covariates and missing outcomes. We restrict our attention to consider methodologies which address a specific missing data pattern, namely monotone missingness. The thesis is divided into two parts. The first part placed a particular emphasis on the so called missing at random (MAR) assumption, but focuses the bulk of attention on multiple imputation techniques. The main aim of this part is to investigate various modelling techniques using application studies, and to specify the most appropriate techniques as well as gain insight into the appropriateness of these techniques for handling incomplete data analysis. This thesis first deals with the problem of missing covariate values to estimate regression parameters under a monotone missing covariate pattern. The study is devoted to a comparison of different imputation techniques, namely markov chain monte carlo (MCMC), regression, propensity score (PS) and last observation carried forward (LOCF). The results from the application study revealed that we have universally best methods to deal with missing covariates when the missing data pattern is monotone. Of the methods explored, the MCMC and regression methods of imputation to estimate regression parameters with monotone missingness were preferable to the PS and LOCF methods. This study is also concerned with comparative analysis of the techniques applied to incomplete Gaussian longitudinal outcome or response data due to random dropout. Three different methods are assessed and investigated, namely multiple imputation (MI), inverse probability weighting (IPW) and direct likelihood analysis. The findings in general favoured MI over IPW in the case of continuous outcomes, even when the MAR mechanism holds. The findings further suggest that the use of MI and direct likelihood techniques lead to accurate and equivalent results as both techniques arrive at the same substantive conclusions. The study also compares and contrasts several statistical methods for analyzing incomplete non-Gaussian longitudinal outcomes when the underlying study is subject to ignorable dropout. The methods considered include weighted generalized estimating equations (WGEE), multiple imputation after generalized estimating equations (MI-GEE) and generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The current study found that the MI-GEE method was considerably robust, doing better than all the other methods in terms of small and large sample sizes, regardless of the dropout rates. The primary interest of the second part of the thesis falls under the non-ignorable dropout (MNAR) modelling frameworks that rely on sensitivity analysis in modelling incomplete Gaussian longitudinal data. The aim of this part is to deal with non-random dropout by explicitly modelling the assumptions that caused the dropout and incorporated this additional sub-model into the model for the measurement data, and to assess the sensitivity of the modelling assumptions. The study pays attention to the analysis of repeated Gaussian measures subject to potentially non-random dropout in order to study the influence on inference that might be caused in the data by the dropout process. We consider the construction of a particular type of selection model, namely the Diggle-Kenward model as a tool for assessing the sensitivity of a selection model in terms of the modelling assumptions. The major conclusions drawn were that there was evidence in favour of the MAR process rather than an MCAR process in the context of the assumed model. In addition, there was the need to obtain further insight into the data by comparing various sensitivity analysis frameworks. Lastly, two families of models were also compared and contrasted to investigate the potential influence on inference that dropout might have or exert on the dependent measurement data considered, and to deal with incomplete sequences. The models were based on selection and pattern mixture frameworks used for sensitivity analysis to jointly model the distribution of the dropout process and longitudinal measurement process. The results of the sensitivity analysis were in agreement and hence led to similar parameter estimates. Additional confidence in the findings was gained as both models led to similar results for significant effects such as marginal treatment effects.en
dc.language.isoen_ZAen
dc.subjectMultiple imputation (Statistics)en
dc.subjectMultivariate analysis.en
dc.subjectTheses--Statistics and actuarial science.en
dc.subjectMissing observations (Statistics)en
dc.titleComparative approaches to handling missing data, with particular focus on multiple imputation for both cross-sectional and longitudinal models.en
dc.typeThesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record