• Login
    View Item 
    •   ResearchSpace Home
    • College of Law and Management Studies
    • Graduate School of Business and Leadership
    • Masters Degrees (Graduate School of Business and Leadership)
    • View Item
    •   ResearchSpace Home
    • College of Law and Management Studies
    • Graduate School of Business and Leadership
    • Masters Degrees (Graduate School of Business and Leadership)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Barriers to entry and first mover advantages of a small pioneering company in the modern competitive environment.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Oosthuis_Brian_Shawn_2003.pdf (6.908Mb)
    Date
    2003
    Author
    Oosthuis, Brian Shawn.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study investigates two strategic issues that small pioneering companies should always place emphasis on. Barriers to entry and first mover advantages carry such strategic significance that it should be a priority of any pioneering company, regardless of size. Contemporary studies have questioned the absolute ability of barriers to entry to thwart the entrance of new competitors in an industry, or the sustainability of first mover advantages. The implication being that barriers to entry and first mover advantages should not be high on a strategic agenda, as initiatives in this regard can be overcome by companies with superior resources, or due to the diverse strategies and objectives of companies. This study considers the case of a small pioneering company and analyses the competitive environment of the industry it intends to enter. The analysis utilises Porter's Five Forces Framework in a modified form. The framework was chosen as it considers the structural determinants of an industry, from which competitive pressure elements such as barriers to entry and first mover advantages can be identified and analysed. This modification is necessary as first mover advantages are typically separate considerations for pioneering companies in strategic formulation. This analysis considers the Five Forces of competitive pressure, but replaces first mover advantages with competitive rivalry, due to the particular circumstances encountered by pioneering companies. The relevant determinants of competitive pressure are then identified and ranked, in terms of priority, to give guidance to the strategic planning, formulation and implementation process. The analysis stops short of developing a full strategic plan but is sufficient to highlight the competitive issues that will need to be considered. The case study illustrates how barriers to entry and first mover advantages can still be fundamental to the strategic development process, regardless of the resources and strategy of potential entrants. The case study also proposes a model that spatially depicts the prioritisation of the ensuing strategic issues that are precipitated when analysing Porter's Five Forces Framework.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10413/3865
    Collections
    • Masters Degrees (Graduate School of Business and Leadership) [929]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of ResearchSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisorsTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisorsType

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV