Antifungal activity of endophytes from arctotis arctotoides (l.f.) o. hoffm against pythium and rhizoctonia root-rot diseases of maize (zea mays L.)

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the predominant crops worldwide, together with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Approximately 60% of maize produced in South Africa is white maize and is a staple food for many South Africans. About 40% of maize grown is yellow maize and is used for animal feed. About 73% of maize produced in South Africa is produced in the Free State, Mpumalanga, and North West provinces. Maize is grown under various climatic conditions, which sometimes become favourable for disease development. Various plant pathogens such as-, Fusarium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Pythium spp. cause diseases in maize. These diseases are usually controlled by cultural practices and fungicides-. However, these control strategies are not always effective, especially against root rot pathogens. Infection of maize plants by Pythium spp. causes brown root lesions, whereas R. solani causes dark-brown root lesions. As an alternative to cultural and chemical control, biological control can be used to mitigate plant diseases. Biological control is based on the premise that the biocontrol agents (BCAs) produce antimicrobial compounds that inhibit pathogens’ growth. BCAs also compete with pathogens for resources in the host plant and rhizosphere. Some BCAs induce systemic acquired resistance in host plants. Endophytes are microorganisms that dwell within tissues in their host plants without any visible symptoms, and can be used as BCAs against plant diseases. Medicinal plants are host to a distinctive microbiome and are an excellent source of bioactive compounds which can be applied in agriculture, medical and pharmaceutical fields. Previous studies have shown that endophytes from medicinal plants are involved in producing secondary metabolites in their host plants. These endophytes impact the functioning of antioxidant enzymes, resulting in activated defence mechanisms against pathogens. Arctotis arctotoides (L.f) O. Hoffm is a medicinal plant used as pastes or decoctions against wounds, epilepsy, ringworms and other ailments. There are no reports where this medicinal plant has been tested against plant pathogens hence this study is necessary. In this study, endophytes isolated from A. arctotoides were tested against R. solani and Pythium spp. root rot pathogens of maize. This is based on the premise that endophytes isolated from this plant will inhibit the growth of plant pathogens.

Disease-free A. arctotoides plants were collected from various locations in the Eastern Cape Province, Republic of South Africa, and transported to the laboratory to isolate bacterial endophytes. Twenty-six (26) bacterial endophytes were isolated from the roots, stem, and leaves within 24 hours of sampling. These endophytes were screened in vitro for their antifungal activity against R. solani and Pythium spp. root pathogens of maize. The endophytes were identified using Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) sequencing. Results of the in vitro screening showed that ten bacterial endophytes were antagonistic to R. solani, whereas-, 11 were antagonistic to Pythium spp. The percentage inhibition ranged from 17-50% and 8-64% for R. solani and Pythium spp. respectively. Only three bacterial endophytes (Bacillus cereus NYR11, Morganella morganii L143 NYR3, and M. morganii KC-Tt-01 NYL20) inhibited the growth of both pathogens significantly. The antagonistic effect of the best ten bacterial endophytes against each root rot pathogen was further evaluated under greenhouse conditions. The bacterial endophytes were applied as seed treatments and pathogens inoculated in the rhizosphere except the control treatments. The parameters measured were: -plant height once a week for six weeks, root length, number of root lesions, root and shoot weight at harvesting. Maize plants treated with the endophytes Bacillus cereus NYR11, Proteus mirabilis NYR9, and Morganella morganii strain DG56-16 NYS3 against R. solani and Myroides odoratus strain 6G NYL18, Alcaligenes faecalis NYS7, and Ralstonia spp. NYR8 against Pythium spp. showed low numbers of root lesions, increased root length, root and shoot weights. These bacterial endophytes showed potential to be used as BCAs against R. solani and Pythium spp. The antagonistic effect of the best three bacterial endophytes against each pathogen was further evaluated as mixtures in the greenhouse. These were B. cereus NYR11, P. mirabilis NYR9, and M. morganii DG56-16 NYS3 against R. solani and M. odoratus strain 6G NYL18, A. faecalis NYS7, and Ralstonia spp. NYR8 against Pythium spp. The mixtures were applied as seed treatments and pathogens inoculated in the rhizosphere except the control treatments. The parameters measured were-, plant height once a week for six weeks, root length, number of root lesions, root and shoot weight at harvesting. B. cereus NYR11 + M. morganii DG56-16 NYS3, and P. mirabilis NYR9 + M. morganii DG56-16 NYS3, significantly reduced the number of root lesions, increased root length and root weight in the presence of R. solani. In maize plants inoculated with Pythium spp. the single applications of Ralstonia spp. NYR8 and M. odoratus 6G NYL18 were better treatments than mixtures. These endophytes, especially M. odoratus 6G NYL18 increased root length, root and shoot weight, reduced the number of root lesions when applied individually. The M. odoratus 6G NYL18 + A. faecalis NYS7 + Ralstonia spp. NYR8 mixture was a better treatment than other mixtures, even though it was not better than the single application M. odoratus NYL18. The potential mode of action of the best three endophytes against each pathogen were evaluated. Modes of action assessed in this study were siderophore production, protein, chitin, and cellulose degradation. Out of six bacterial endophytes evaluated, only Ralstonia spp. NYR8 did not produce cellulase and siderophores. P. mirabilis NYR9 and M. odoratus 6G NYL18 did not produce protease. All the bacterial endophytes were unable to degrade chitin. Other modes of action used by the bacterial endophytes against the pathogens can be further evaluated.