The interpretation of 'substantial and compelling' by South African courts and a comparison with Minnesota sentencing guidelines.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hoctor, Shannon Vaughn. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chikoko, Vimbai. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-26T13:01:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-26T13:01:26Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2017 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description | Master of Laws. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 2017. | en_US |
| dc.description.notes | No abstract provided. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10413/15857 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_ZA | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Sentencing. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Mandatory minimum sentences. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Minnesota sentencing guidelines. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | S v Malgas. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act 38 of 2007. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Crime prevention. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Crime deterrrence. | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Departure from minimum sentences. | en_US |
| dc.title | The interpretation of 'substantial and compelling' by South African courts and a comparison with Minnesota sentencing guidelines. | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |