Quantifying the hydrological benefits of investing in ecological infrastructure through the use of ecological and hydrological models.

Abstract

Ecosystems are vital for the survival of all life on earth. Healthy ecosystems in turn provide invaluable goods and services that contribute to sustainable growth. Therefore, in order to produce and deliver goods and services at an optimum, ecosystems need to be managed, maintained and protected to remain within functioning capacity. There are many stresses that impact ecosystems functioning, examples of these include, growing population, climate change and land use/land cover (LULC) changes. These stressors alter ecological infrastructure (EI), which is the base from which ecosystem services (ES) are derived. EI is the natural equivalent of built infrastructure, e.g. dams, and provides beneficial services to society. Previously, attention had been centred on supply-sided interventions which focused mainly on built infrastructure investments. Despite their importance, the focus needs to shift to integrate investments between both built infrastructure and EI, this owes to built-infrastructure sites becoming scarce, and the majority of water resources already being allocated. The benefits of EI investments are generally not easily or explicitly demonstrated therefore there remains a reluctance to adopt EI investment approaches. To inform investment decisions pertaining to water resources management, tools such as ecological and hydrological models can be used. Thus, the aim of the study was to demonstrate how both ecological and hydrological can be used in tandem with each other to result in making more well-informed water resources management decisions. The novelty of the research was thus twofold: (1) demonstrating how LULC changes impact EI functionality in producing and delivering HES, (2) identifying how both ecological and hydrological models can be applied synergistically to reveal the full potential benefits of investments in EI. The study was conducted across the uMkhomazi catchment with a focus on the proposed Smithfield. A major concern within the catchment is the high degree of soil erosion which could potentially impact the functionality of the dam. Based on the dominant LULC within the catchment, i.e., grasslands, the targeted land management intervention selected was grassland restoration of degraded surfaces, with the protection/management of grasslands currently in good health. Grasslands provide a wide array of ecosystem benefits but are often disregarded in value therefore, it was assumed that changes to this LULC would result in significant impacts on HES.