Privacy by (re)design: a comparative study of the protection of personal information in the mobile applications ecosystem under United States, European Union and South African law.
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The dissertation presents a comparative desktop study of the application of a Privacy by Design
(PbD) approach to the protection of personal information in the mobile applications ecosystem
under the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the California Consumer
Protection Act (CCPA) in the United States, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
in the European Union, and the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) in South
Africa.
The main problem considered in the thesis is whether there is an ‘accountability
gap’ within the legislation selected for comparative study. This is analysed by examining
whether the legislation can be enforced against parties other than the app developer in the
mobile app ecosystem, as it is theorised that only on this basis will the underlying technologies
and architecture of mobile apps be changed to support a privacy by (re)design approach. The
key research question is what legal approach is to be adopted to enforce such an approach
within the mobile apps ecosystem.
It describes the complexity of the mobile apps ecosystem, identifying the key
role players and the processing operations that take place.
It sets out what is encompassed by the conceptual framework of PbD, and why
the concept of privacy by (re)design may be more appropriate in the context of mobile apps
integrating third party services and products. It identifies the core data protection principles of
data minimisation and accountability, and the nature of informed consent, as being essential to
an effective PbD approach.
It concludes that without strengthening the legal obligations pertaining to the
sharing of personal information with third parties, neither regulatory guidance, as is preferred
in the United States, nor a direct legal obligation, as created by article 25 of the GDPR, is
adequate to enforce a PbD approach within the mobile apps ecosystem. It concludes that
although a PbD approach is implied for compliance by a responsible party with POPIA,
legislative reforms are necessary. It proposes amendments to POPIA to address inadequacies
in the requirements for notice, and to impose obligations on a responsible party in relation to
the sharing of personal information with third parties who will process the personal information
for further, separate purposes.
Description
Doctoral Degree. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.