The efficacy and safety of artemisinin-based combination therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in non-pregnant adults and children : a systematic review.

Abstract

Effective case management of malaria is hampered by the spread of parasite resistance to nonartemisinin antimalarials. To counteract the impact of drug resistance, the World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Currently recommended ACTs are artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate plus amodiaquine, artesunate plus mefloquine, artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. This study sought to review evidence of the efficacy and safety of different non-artemisinin antimalarials in combination with artesunate, artemether or dihydroartemisinin for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in non-pregnant adults and children. The search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and in ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2009. The eligibility and the methodological quality of trials were assessed and data were extracted, using standard forms. Data were captured and analyzed in Review Manager Software, versions 4.2 and 5.0. The outcomes assessed were: treatment failure, fever and parasite clearance time, calculating the relative risk (RR) and a weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval and p-values, indicating statistical significance at 0.05. Thirty-seven trials with 6862 participants were included. Artesunate combined with amodiaquine had a statistically significant lower risk of treatment failure compared to the combination of artesunate with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (RR=0.57, 95% CI [0.33, 0.97], p=0.04, seven trials, N=1341). In addition, treatment with artesunate plus mefloquine was significantly associated with a lower risk of treatment failure compared to artesunate plus azithromycin (RR=0.04, 95% CI [0.00, 0.64], p=0.02, one trial, N=54). There was no significant difference when either mefloquine or atovaquone-proguanil were combination partners with artesunate (RR=2.6, 95% CI [0.93; 7.24], p=0.07, one trial, N=1066). When artesunate was combined with chloroquine, primaquine or azithromycin and compared with artesunate monotherapy, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of unadjusted treatment failure. Each of these comparisons had one trial each. Artesunate plus chloroquine was quicker at clearing fever compared to artesunate plus sulfadoxinepyrimethamine (WMD= -7.20, 95% CI [-12.53, -1.87], one trial, N=132). Few trials adequately reported adverse events. There was no significant difference observed in the risk of adverse events between artesunate plus amodiaquine compared with artesunate monotherapy, however, adverse events were significantly less in artesunate plus amodiaquine compared to artesunate plus methylene-blue. Artesunate plus amodiaquine on the other hand had significantly more adverse events reported compared to artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The findings of this study support the implementation of artemisinin-based combination therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Most crucially, this review found a greater advantage of combining amodiaquine with artesunate compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The efficacy of artesunate plus mefloquine was superior to that of artesunate plus azithromycin. Furthermore, the combination of artemisinins with chloroquine, primaquine and azithromycin has shown very low efficacy and these combination therapies should not be recommended. The reporting of efficacy was not standardized as many trials did not differentiate between re-infections and recrudescences. Adverse events were also not adequately reported.