A case study to assess participants' perceptions on voluntariness and motivations for participating in a clinical trial in Zimbabwe.
Loading...
Date
2012
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Introduction: There is little empirical evidence on voluntariness of participation in clinical
trials due to absence of acceptable measures and universally accepted conceptual frameworks
of voluntariness. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Zimbabwe to examine
participants’ motivations, levels of voluntariness and perceptions about the effect of offers,
pressures and threats on decision making. One hundred participants were recruited from an
ongoing diagnostic trial. Questionnaires adapted from published research, the Perceived
Coercion Scale and Voluntariness Ladder were used for data collection. Results: The need to
access diagnostic services and treatment for tuberculosis was the main motivation for
enrolment in the trial. Participants were not coerced to particpate in the trial but were offered
bus fare. The offer had no effect on their decision to enroll in the trial. Conclusion:
Immediate health benefits have a key impact on participants’ decisions to enrol in a clinical
trial of a diagnostic technique. A comprehensive conceptual framework together with
validated tools for assessing voluntariness in African contexts should be developed.
Description
Thesis (M.Soc.Sc.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2012.
Keywords
Voluntarism--Zimbabwe., Clinical trials--Zimbabwe., Informed consent (Medical law), Volunteers--Zimbabwe., Theses--Psychology.