Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKillian, Beverley Janet.
dc.contributor.advisorSchoeman, Rose Ann.
dc.creatorKriel, Anita Julia.
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-08T08:52:57Z
dc.date.available2012-11-08T08:52:57Z
dc.date.created2003
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10413/7791
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2003.en
dc.description.abstractCurrent research in masculinity studies has emphasised the social construction of a masculine identity rooted in historical and cultural contexts. This view excludes the psychological processes involved in the construction of a sense of self. Social constructionist and psychoanalytic perspectives tend to offer polarised views of the development of a sense of self. By adopting a combined approach incorporating both social constructionism and psychoanalysis, this study investigated how men negotiate social expectations regarding an 'acceptable' personal masculinity, and how they position themselves and others (men and women) in relation to these expectations. The participants were faced with an ideological dilemma regarding whether to conform to social expectations regarding hegemony versus being unique. This ideological dilemma was not easily resolved, resulting in a fragile sense of masculine self. This study shows that socially sanctioned masculine ideologies have significant implications on men's sense of self and the construction of a masculine identity.en
dc.language.isoen_ZAen
dc.subjectMasculinity.en
dc.subjectMasculinity--Social aspects.en
dc.subjectMen--Psychology.en
dc.subjectTheses--Psychology.en
dc.titleMasculinity : an analysis of individual positioning and coping related to hegemony.en
dc.typeThesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record