• Login
    View Item 
    •   ResearchSpace Home
    • College of Humanities
    • School of Arts
    • Languages, Linguistics and Academic Literacy
    • Doctoral Degrees (Languages, Linguistics and Academic Literacy)
    • View Item
    •   ResearchSpace Home
    • College of Humanities
    • School of Arts
    • Languages, Linguistics and Academic Literacy
    • Doctoral Degrees (Languages, Linguistics and Academic Literacy)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Beyond traditional literature : towards oral theory as aural linguistics.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Thesis. (9.018Mb)
    Date
    1996
    Author
    Alant, Jacob Willem.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Oral Theory, which is the discipline that studies the oral tradition, has been characterized as a literary anthropology, centered on essentially two notions: tradition on the one hand, literature on the other. Though emphasis has moved from an initial preoccupation with oral textual form (as advocated by Parry and Lord) to concerns with the oral text as social practice, the anthropological / literary orientation has generally remained intact. But through its designation of a traditional 'other' Oral Theory is, at best, a sub-field of anthropology; the literature it purports to study is not literature, but anthropological data. This undermines the existence of the field as discipline. In this study it is suggested that the essence of orality as subject matter of Oral Theory - should be seen not in the origins of its creativity (deemed 'traditional'), nor in its aesthetic process / product itself ('literature'), but in its use of language deriving from a different 'auditory' conception of language (as contrasted with the largely 'visualist' conception of language at least partly associated with writing). In other words, the study of orality should not be about specific oral 'genres', but about verbalization in general. In terms of its auditory conception, language is primarily defined as existing in sound, a definition which places it in a continuum with other symbolical / meaningful sounds, normally conceptualized as 'music'. Linguistics, being fundamentally scriptist (visualist) in orientation, fails to account for the auditory conception of language. To remedy this, Oral Theory needs to set itself up as an 'aural linguistics' - implying close interdisciplinary collaboration with the field of musicology - through which the linguistic sign of orality could be studied in all its particularity and complexity of meaning.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10413/6519
    Collections
    • Doctoral Degrees (Languages, Linguistics and Academic Literacy) [49]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of ResearchSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisorsTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisorsType

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV