Mathematics for future engineers : a study of teaching and learning mathematics in an engineering curriculum.
Loading...
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This is a study of teaching and learning in the first mathematics module for engineering
students at a South African university. The theoretical framing of the study is derived from
multiple analytical tools: Bernstein’s theory of the Pedagogic Device; the construct of beliefs and
Bloom’s revised taxonomy. As such this study draws on Bernstein’s concepts of
recontextualisation, singulars and regions and classification and framing to describe the three
message systems (content, pedagogy and assessments). The beliefs framework identifies the
teaching styles used by lecturers while Bloom’s revised taxonomy provides the analytical tool to
evaluate the quality of the final examination questions.
This study took a pragmatist stance which privileged a mixed methods approach to data
collection. The first research question sought to determine the role of mathematics in
engineering. To fully understand the role of mathematics in engineering, document analysis was
used to analyse the international (Washington Accord) and national (ECSA) professional body
documents and the institutional requirements and interviews were conducted with academic staff
in the department of mathematics and the school of engineering. The literature showed that
mathematics is a key component in engineering education and in engineering practice. It also
foregrounded the ongoing debate about whether it is sufficient for engineers to know the
practical application of mathematics or whether knowledge of mathematics in all its abstraction
is required.
The second and third research questions looked at how teaching and learning is
approached and reasons why it is approached in those ways. Data were generated from the
documents stated above, observation of lectures as well as tutorials and interviews with relevant
academic staff and students. An analysis of the Washington Accord and ECSA documents fell
within the Official Recontextualising Field and showed the influence of the external bodies on
the recontextualisation of the ME curriculum. The textbook and head of school (MSC),
constituted the Pedagogic Recontextualising Field (PRF), and were found to influence the
framing over selection, sequencing, pacing and evaluative criteria. It was also established that
there was further recontextualisation at the level of the classroom (by lecturers). In effect, the
recontextualisation resulted in the exclusion of proofs and theoretical underpinning of the
mathematics taught. The module showed strong classification of content on the interdisciplinary,
intradisciplinary and interdiscursive level while framing over selection, sequencing, pacing and
evaluative criteria were strong. The regionalization of the ME module resulted in it being a site
of conflict and struggle over ownership of the pedagogic device.
Despite differences in beliefs about mathematics, the teaching styles of lecturers were
similar in that they demonstrated an algorithmic, assessment-oriented approach to teaching. The
analysis revealed that lecturers viewed mathematics in terms of application and as a tool to solve
engineering problems. Analysis of the final examination questions showed that it fell within the
cognitive domain of Apply in Blooms’ revised taxonomy. A closer inspection of the final
examination questions and those of the mock examination showed a close correlation between
the two indicating that the conceptual demand was not as high as initially established. Despite
the strong alignment between lectures, tutorials and assessments, many students were
unsuccessful in passing the module.
The thesis concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings and suggests
recommendations for the improvement of teaching and learning mathematics to future engineers
and for further research.
Description
Ph. D. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 2014.
Keywords
Mathematics -- Study and teaching., Engineers -- Mathematics., Engineering students., Engineering -- Curricula., Theses -- Education.