Has the LM and Others v Government of the Republic of Namibia case closed the door on the claim of unfair discrimination by HIV positive women alleging to have been coerced or forced into being sterilised because of their HIV status?: A critical analysis of a possibility of a class action or a public interest action on behalf of South African women living with HIV who have been sterilised without their informed consent.

Badul, Chantal Jacqueline.Strode, Ann Elaine.Khumalo, Lindiwe Rosetta.2019-07-122019-07-122018https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/16365Thesis (LLM)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2019.No abstract provided.enInvoluntary sterilization.HIV-positive women.AIDS (Disease) in women.Reproductive rights.HIV-positive women - South Africa.Forced sterilization.Coercive sterilization.Reproductive rights.Litigation.Discrimination.Class action.Informed consent.HIV positive womenHas the LM and Others v Government of the Republic of Namibia case closed the door on the claim of unfair discrimination by HIV positive women alleging to have been coerced or forced into being sterilised because of their HIV status?: A critical analysis of a possibility of a class action or a public interest action on behalf of South African women living with HIV who have been sterilised without their informed consent.Thesis