History
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10413/7185
Browse
Browsing History by Subject "Amahlongwa Mission Station."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Cultural Heritage Tourism Potential at Six former American Board Mission Stations.(University of KwaZulu-Natal., 2010) Fakude, Gordon Phiwinhlanhla Ian.This initial assessment of the cultural heritage tourism potential is a component of a broader project aimed at conducting research and revitalizing selected former American Zulu Mission Stations in southern parts of KwaZulu-Natal. Whilst the Heritage, Tourism and Community Development Project is being considered by a range of stakeholders including local communities at the localities where the six mission stations are located, the University of KwaZulu-Natal is charged with leading the research component of the project. The purpose of research in this project is to 'lay bare' the indelible print on the cultural and heritage landscape left behind by the missionaries in this region of South Africa. A principal component of the project is to encourage community development through promotion of religious heritage tourism in order to stimulate local tourism-based production and services such as crafts, hospitality accommodation and cultural/educational events in the Mission Stations. Therefore, the purpose of this part of the research is to present an initial scan of the heritage tourism potential of the six mission stations.Item History and Heritage: Socio-economic profiles of six former American Board Mission Stations in southern KwaZulu-Natal.(University of KwaZulu-Natal., 2010) Zungu, Ntokozo.; Khumalo, Vukile.This paper is based on a questionnaire that a team of researchers at the University of KwZulu-Natal (Howard Campus) in collaboration with community activists conducted between February 2007 and May 2008 in six former American Board Mission Stations; namely, Adams, Amahlongwa, Ifafa, Mfume, Umthwalume and Umzumbe in southern KwaZulu-Natal. The research questionnaire sought in the first instance to establish socio-economic profiles of these mission stations. We think such a profile would allow us to answer the following two questions. First, what is to be done with the old infrastructure and memory of the activities of the American Board Mission? Second, how residents of the identified mission stations feel about the possibility of their church structures becoming heritage sites?