The implications of structuration theory for education.

UKZN ResearchSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Nel, Berndine F.
dc.creator Naidoo, Pathmaloshini.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-23T07:15:05Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-23T07:15:05Z
dc.date.created 1989
dc.date.issued 1989
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10413/3485
dc.description Thesis (M.Ed.)-University of Natal, 1989. en_US
dc.description.abstract This dissertation is concerned with the implications of the theory of structuration for education. Central to the theory of structuration, is the idea of structuring social relations across time-space, in virtue of the duality of structure. Anthony Giddens, who coined the term 'structuration', acknowledges the call for a decentering of the subject but reaffirms that this does not imply the evaporation of subjectivity into an "empty universe of signs". Rather, social practices, "biting into time and space", are considered to be at the root of the constitution of both subject and social object. However, the value of structuration theory lies in the fact that it helps to illuminate problems of educational research. The points of connection are to do with working out the logical implications of studying a 'subject matter' of which the researcher is already a part and with elucidating the substantiative connotations of the core notions of structure and action. The polarisation in thinking about education is only one symptom of the classic and fundamental tension in social theory between those explanations which stress structure and those stressing action, between deterministic and voluntaristic views of behaviour, between a concern with statics and one with dynamics, between man viewed as subject and man viewed as object. The theory of structuration has implications for education in that it has pointed to a possible resolution of this dualism. The oppositions of society and individual, determinism and voluntarism, structure and action and so on are dealt with by denying that they are in opposition. Social structures are both constituted by human agency and yet at the same time are the very medium of this constitution. In societal terms, actors, since they know how to behave, contribute through their actions to the continuous production and reproduction of the social structure of rules. Yet in every action there is the potential for actors to participate in changing the 'rules' or structure which they may know and realize in further action. In this way Giddens is able to deal with a recurrent difficulty in sociological theory accounting for both continuity and change. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Educational sociology. en_US
dc.subject Sociology. en_US
dc.subject Theses--Education. en_US
dc.title The implications of structuration theory for education. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UKZN ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account