Naicker, Minalyoshini.
Abstract:
This study examines how educators in a primary school view the teaching of
HIV and AIDS and sexuality in the context of delivering the LO curriculum.
It seeks to establish whether the educators are properly trained for and
supported in their tasks and further seeks to establish their attitudes towards
teaching these sensitive subjects.
The study is based on semi-structured interviews with eight Life Orientation
(LO) teachers who work at CJ Primary School (CJPS) in Durban. CJPS is a
well established school that formerly served only a white learner community.
Since the early 1990s its racial demography has changed and it is now racially
mixed with Indian learners constituting a slight majority. The school offers
classes from Grade 0 to Grade 7.
The teachers interviewed for this study were all involved in teaching LO in
the senior primary phase and all had delivered lessons on HIV/ AIDS and
sexuality. The sample comprised one African, one White and six Indian
teachers and was made up of three males and five females. The school
timetable includes two LO periods a week (i.e. 2 hours per week is devoted
to LO) and evidence suggests that teachers are serious about the teaching they
do in these periods.
It was found that levels of both pre and in-service training in the areas of HIV
and AIDS and sexuality and gender were low. Only 2 out of the 8 teachers
had been trained in HIV and AIDS and sexuality education. 5 of the 8
educators had received some form of training, (weeklong workshops, for
example) but many still felt unconfident about teaching sexuality.
Although national policy for teaching HIV and AIDS and sexuality does exist
and the school also has its own set of policy documents relating to the LO
curriculum, most of the teachers had not seen the national documents and
were unaware of the school's policy. HIV and AIDS and sexuality are themes
which are taught across the curriculum but rather cramped into one term's
allotment of LO lessons which results in a lack of depth being achieved.
Understandings of sexuality were basic and generally devoid of 'gender'.
It appears as though the female teachers were more enthusiastic about
teaching HIV and AIDS and sexuality than were the men and the lone
African educator was the most strident in demanding that the school devote
more attention to these subjects, possibly because in her own life she had
already directly encountered the ravages of the pandemic. There is some
competition within the curriculum about which subjects should get the most
attention and priority. Generally speaking, language teaching and mathematics
were considered more important than the LO.