Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorThomson, Elza.
dc.creatorGenislav, Guy.
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-01T11:39:02Z
dc.date.available2003
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10413/2422
dc.descriptionThesis (MBA)-University of Natal, 2003.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe increased activities within the mergers and acquisitions market in recent times has highlighted the importance of Commissions, whose responsibility it is to protect competition in the common market place. An area of disagreement which often arises between merging parties and authorities - at the expense of time and money - is the definition of a relevant market within which to measure competition. This proposal seeks, with the aid of a recent case (Unilever vs. Competition Commission of South Africa), to identify why relevant markets are so incoherently drawn and whether guidelines mutually agreed upon between the merging parties and the Commission could aid in reaching a timely and cost effective resolution.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectConsolidation and merger corporations.en_US
dc.subjectTheses--Business administration.en_US
dc.titleWhy do merging parties and authorities define relevant markets differently.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record