The effect of aversive racism on mock legal decision making.

UKZN ResearchSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Durrheim, Kevin.
dc.creator Haw, St. John Blake. 2008 2008
dc.description Thesis (M.A.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2008. en_US
dc.description.abstract The present study experimentally examined the effect(s) of aversive racism on mock legal decisions made by university students. The experiment adopted a 3 (Evidence quality: low, ambiguous or high) x 2 (race stereotype crime: black vs. white) x 2 (Defendant race: black vs. white) between subjects design, in which 785 black, white, Indian and coloured participants were asked to judge legal cases. The legal vignettes were piloted to ensure that low, ambiguous and high evidence conditions were clearly represented, and that the white stereotype and black stereotype crimes chosen for the research were appropriate. Participants were each given two vignettes and used 10-point scales to judge a) the guilt or innocence of the defendant(s) and b) the sentence they would recommend for the defendant(s) should they be found guilty by a court of law. Our prediction that we would find evidence for the classic aversive racism effect in this sample was not supported, and no evidence of racial bias was found. Interestingly, white participants judged the guilt of defendants more leniently than all other race groups. These results are discussed and recommendations for future research are made. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Discrimination in justice administration--South Africa.
dc.subject Racism--South Africa.
dc.subject Crime and race--South Africa.
dc.subject Equity before the law--South Africa.
dc.subject South Africa--Race relations.
dc.subject Theses--Psychology.
dc.title The effect of aversive racism on mock legal decision making. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UKZN ResearchSpace

Advanced Search


My Account